Ok, so let’s just go ahead and get it out of the way…SEO is not the only thing that matters when it comes to your website. We definitely understand that. There are a great number of important goals and functions of your site, and you want it to captivate and engage your clients – period. However, many architecture websites miss the mark when it comes to content; that could mean SEO and engaging potential clients! So, we’ve combed oodles of sites and would love to share with you this list of ten words that you and your architecture firm should consider replacing with something else on your website.
- Dwelling. Well, guess what, I don’t know a single client that has ever searched for a “dwelling architect” – so there goes SEO. Perhaps more importantly, how many clients have you met that used the word “dwelling” to refer to their own house? Even though it sounds great in a case study, consider replacing the word “dwelling” with something more casual in your web copy.
- Design. Hear me out! Design is an important word to have, no question about it. In this instance though, we might recommend that you replace the word design in half the places that you have it on your site if you want better SEO. The issue is that design is a very versatile word, which hurts your SEO. Not as many people look for commercial designers as they do for commercial architects.
- Multi-disciplinary or Multidisciplinary. Out of the ridiculous bazillions of searches that Google handles, guess how many people search for “multidisciplinary design” per month…210 (as of today). Add to that, the value that the word “multidisciplinary” holds for your clients and it’s time to remove that word from your vocabulary.
- Award-winning. This one isn’t a total scrapper, but let’s be realistic about what this means. No one searches for an “award winning architecture firm” online. To be exact, 10 people per month on average via Google. So, if you want this to be relevant, give it some point of reference.
- On the Boards. (even though it’s a phrase instead of a word) This is a popular section of the website for architecture and engineering firms, but unfortunately, it’s not terminology that people outside of the industry use. It does have a higher search volume than a few other terms on this list, but consider switching this out for something more simple and familiar to your clients.
- We. Take a look at your site and see often you say “we” throughout your copy. You might be surprised at the final count. Write about your clients and their needs more and minimize the “we”.
- Program. Until your client is actually your client, they likely have never heard the word “program” associated with their project. It is an amazingly important part of the process, but could be substituted with better language for SEO and for their comfort level. Save that language for case studies or architizer.
- Nationwide. Clients have projects in certain locations. They may have them in multiple locations, but they are still specific. “Nationwide” doesn’t add much value to your copy; if you work in multiple states across the country, show your work in your portfolio and share the location specifically.
- Significant. If it wasn’t significant, it shouldn’t be on your website.
- Full-service. Try explaining to your clients what you mean when you say that you are a full-service architecture firm. Then, try explaining what an architecture firm would be like that wasn’t full-service, and give an example. Not an easy task. The term is pretty much fluff and does very little to differentiate your architecture firm’s website from any of your competitors’.
There’s our ten words (or nine words and a phrase)! Have any other good ones you think we should add to the list? Feel free to share some in the comments.
Thanks for taking away many of the most commonly used words in the architecture vernacular. Architects are creative professionals, and as such, should definitely be imaginative in describing what we do and differentiating our individual firms from the next.
Thanks for the read and comment Karen!
Great list. I completely agree with # 10. It’s rare when I come across a website that adequately describes their process and services.
I was wondering what data you found for sustainability. I think it could be argued that this word has become overused. Good architecture and design is sustainable, so why do we still feel the need to point it out?
Hi Kendal! Thanks for the comment. The thing about sustainability is that it is widely popular, therefore pretty heavily searched for when compared to other items on this list. So, from an SEO perspective, a variety of arrangements of sustainability, sustainable design, etc. is a plus. The key would be relevance to your actual content as well though. The issue I have with it is not overuse, but misuse. Sustainability isn’t a marketing angle, it’s a necessary consideration to a successful design process. We typically steer clients away from discussing sustainability or green aspects as a differentiator, but more as a part of their process and proof of their dedication. If they don’t have a good story to tell (which some don’t) then we don’t recommend wasting the messaging on it. You’re right about good architecture and its relationship to sustainability, but quite often clients don’t know that until they’re educated on it!